Skip all navigation and jump to content Jump to site navigation
NASA Logo - Goddard Space Flight Center

+ NASA Homepage

    
Goddard Space Flight Center
About MODIS News Data Tools /images2 Science Team Science Team Science Team

   + Home
ABOUT MODIS
MODIS Publications Link
MODIS Presentations Link
MODIS Biographies Link
MODIS Science Team Meetings Link
 

 

 

Boegh, E, Poulsen, RN, Butts, M, Abrahamsen, P, Dellwik, E, Hansen, S, Hasager, CB, Ibrom, A, Loerup, JK, Pilegaard, K, Soegaard, H (2009). "Remote sensing based evapotranspiration and runoff modeling of agricultural, forest and urban flux sites in Denmark: From field to macro-scale". JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 377(4-Mar), 300-316.

Abstract
Evapotranspiration (E) and runoff (R-T) was modeled for the island of Sjaelland (approximate to 7330 km(2)) in Denmark at multiple spatial scales encompassing agricultural, forest and urban land surfaces. National data were used to represent spatial variations in climate, soil properties and lower boundary conditions, and the EOS/MODIS Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) was used to map (a) the temporal development in leaf area index for agricultural fields, (b) a dynamic canopy coefficient (K-c) of forests being scaled between its minimum and maximum values for use in the FAD Penman-Monteith equation, and (c) the impervious land cover fraction of urban regions. At field level, the use of local-scale model parameters, NDVI time series and site-specific methodologies to simulate E of the 3 major land surface types (agricultural land, forests and urban regions) explained 67-79% of the observed variability in eddy covariance latent heat fluxes. The effective spatial resolution needed to adopt local-scale model parameters for spatial-deterministic hydrological modeling was assessed using a high-spatial resolution (30 m) variogram analysis of the NDVI. The use of the NDVI variogram to evaluate land surface heterogeneity is based on the assumption that sub-class soil heterogeneity can be indirectly represented by the observed spatial variations in NDVI due to its close affiliation with vegetation growth, soil water uptake and evapotranspiration. Multiple spatial resolution water balance simulations were compared to validate the identified effective spatial resolution (500 m) model representation of land cover, NDVI and drainage pattern. Simulated R-T of 30 catchments were compared with the fast-flow component of stream discharge data (Q - Q(b)) which is insensitive to groundwater abstraction and most sensitive to the spatial land surface representation. A good agreement was observed in the timing and size of peak flows in catchment dominated by agricultural, forest and urban land uses in periods when E has important control on the water balance and soil water percolation to groundwater is negligible (Days 125-300). The presence/absence of pipe drains, urban surface runoff and forest parameterization cause very large differences in the water balance of agricultural, forest and urban regions. The results show that the use of local-scale standard model parameters and NDVI time series representing agricultural, forest and urban land surfaces in physically based hydrological modeling makes it possible to reproduce much of the observed variability (48-73%) in stream flow (Q - Q(b)) when data and modeling is applied at an effective spatial resolution capable of representing land surface heterogeneity. In order to further improve the results, (1) advanced spatial parameterization methods are needed to improve the modeling of bare soil E of agricultural fields, (2) the impact of local conditions, such as tree age and nutrient levels, should be used to parameterize the maximum K-c used for forest E modeling, (3) high accuracy remote sensing based estimation of vegetation parameters is particularly important during sparsely vegetated conditions, and (4) the use of component stream flow data to evaluate the physical consistency of spatial-deterministic models appears to be feasible and should be further explored. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

DOI:
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.029

ISSN:
0022-1694

FirstGov logo Privacy Policy and Important Notices NASA logo

Curator: Brandon Maccherone
NASA Official: Shannell Frazier

NASA Home Page Goddard Space Flight Center Home Page