Skip all navigation and jump to content Jump to site navigation
About MODIS News Data Tools /images2 Science Team Science Team Science Team

   + Home
MODIS Publications Link
MODIS Presentations Link
MODIS Biographies Link
MODIS Science Team Meetings Link



Barcza, Z, Kern, A, Haszpra, L, Kljun, N (2009). Spatial representativeness of tall tower eddy covariance measurements using remote sensing and footprint analysis. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 149(5), 795-807.

We present a method for the estimation of the spatial representativeness of tall tower eddy covariance measurements monitoring a heterogeneous landscape. The approach attributes the measured signal to the different ecosystems surrounding the tall tower site. For the identification of the ecosystems, remotely sensed vegetation index time series are used. Using 250 in grid resolution defined by the available MODIS vegetation index data, we quantify the spatial distribution of winter and summer crops and we also provide an estimate on the fractional crop coverage for pixels with heterogeneous crop type. Using a state-of-the-art footprint model applicable in the mixed layer we calculate a footprint climatology for the 5-year period 2003-2007. With the synergy of the footprint analysis and the land cover classification scheme we quantify the representativeness of the eddy covariance measurement. It was found that the source region distribution is very similar from year to year. The biggest impact to the measurement originates generally within 1 km radius from the tower. 75-80% of the measured signal originates from agricultural areas, while the contribution of pastures is also relevant. Though there are important other land use types in the region (e.g. forests, settlements) their contribution to the measured signal is rather small (<5% for forested regions, <2% for urban areas). Inside the source area the relative importance and spatial distribution of summer and winter crops is variable among the years, which may influence the measured signal due to the different timing of the intensive carbon uptake period and harvest. The presented methodology is used to estimate summer and winter crop-specific carbon dioxide exchange time series. The crop-specific carbon dioxide fluxes are markedly different in each year, and exhibit strong covariation with the crop-specific NDVI time series. The results further suggest that the applied footprint model provides accurate footprint estimates. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.



NASA Home Page Goddard Space Flight Center Home Page