Skip all navigation and jump to content Jump to site navigation
About MODIS News Data Tools /images2 Science Team Science Team Science Team

   + Home
ABOUT MODIS
MODIS Publications Link
MODIS Presentations Link
MODIS Biographies Link
MODIS Science Team Meetings Link
 

 

 

Smolander, S, Stenberg, P (2005). Simple parameterizations of the radiation budget of uniform broadleaved and coniferous canopies. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 94(3), 355-363.

Abstract
Simulations of the different components of the spectral radiation budget of structurally simple leaf and shoot canopies with varying canopy leaf area index (LAI) were performed. The aims were (1) to test a proposed parameterization of the budget using two spectrally invariant canopy structural parameters (p and p(t)) governing canopy absorption and transmittance, respectively, and (2) to incorporate the effect of within-shoot scattering in the parameterization for shoot canopies. Results showed that canopy spectral absorption and scattering were well described by a single parameter, the canopy p value or 'recollision probability', which was closely related to LAI, The relationship between p and LAI was however different in leaf and shoot canopy: e.g., at the same LAI the recollision probability was larger in the shoot canopy. It was shown that the p value of the shoot canopy could be decomposed into the p value of an individual shoot (p(sh)) and the p value of the leaf canopy with the same effective LAI (LAI(e)). The canopy p value allows calculation of canopy absorption and scattering at any given wavelength from the leaf (or needle) scattering coefficient at the same wavelength. To calculate canopy reflectance, separation of the downward and upward scattered parts is needed in addition. The proposed parameter p(t) worked rather well in the leaf canopy at moderate values of LAI, but not in the coniferous shoot canopy nor at high values of LAI. However, the simulated fraction of upward scattered radiation increased in a straightforward manner with LAI, and was not particularly sensitive to the leaf (or needle) scattering coefficient. Judged by this 'smooth' behavior, the existence of another kind of simple parameterization for this separation remains an interesting possibility. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

DOI:
10.1016/j.rse.2004.10.010

ISSN:
0034-4257

NASA Home Page Goddard Space Flight Center Home Page