Skip all navigation and jump to content Jump to site navigation
About MODIS News Data Tools /images2 Science Team Science Team Science Team

   + Home
MODIS Publications Link
MODIS Presentations Link
MODIS Biographies Link
MODIS Science Team Meetings Link



Schuurmans, JM; van Geer, FC; Bierkens, MFP (2011). Remotely sensed latent heat fluxes for model error diagnosis: a case study. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 15(3), 759-769.

This study shows that remotely sensed ET(act) is useful in hydrological modelling for the procedure of model calibration and shows it potential to update soil moisture predictions. Comparison of modeled and remotely sensed ET(act) together with the outcomes of our data assimilation procedure points out potential model errors, both conceptual and flux-related. Assimilation of remotely sensed ET(act) results in a realistic spatial adjustment of soil moisture, except for the area where the model suffers from conceptual errors (forest with deep groundwater levels). By using operational (i.e. available for community in practice) data and models we aim to show the potential and limitations of using remotely sensed ET(act) in the practice of hydrological modelling. We use satellite data of both ASTER and MODIS for the same two days in the summer of 2006 that, in association with the Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL), provides us the spatial distribution of daily ET(act). The model, used by the local water board, is a physically based distributed hydrological model of a small catchment (70 km(2)) in The Netherlands that simulates the water flow in both the unsaturated and saturated zone. Model outcomes of ET(act) show values that are at least 20% lower than those estimated by SEBAL, which is due to the fact that different evapotranspiration methods are used. The spatial pattern of ET(act) from the hydrological model resembles the soil map, whereas the ET(act) from SEBAL resembles the land use map. As both ASTER and MODIS images were available for the same days, this study provides an opportunity to compare the worth of these two satellite sources. It is shown that, although ASTER provides better insight in the spatial distribution of ET(act) due to its higher spatial resolution than MODIS, they appeared in this study just as useful.



NASA Home Page Goddard Space Flight Center Home Page