Skip all navigation and jump to content Jump to site navigation
NASA Logo - Goddard Space Flight Center

+ NASA Homepage

    
Goddard Space Flight Center
About MODIS News Data Tools /images2 Science Team Science Team Science Team

   + Home
ABOUT MODIS
MODIS Publications Link
MODIS Presentations Link
MODIS Biographies Link
MODIS Science Team Meetings Link
 

 

 

Yebra, M; Van Dijk, A; Leuning, R; Huete, A; Guerschman, JP (2013). Evaluation of optical remote sensing to estimate actual evapotranspiration and canopy conductance. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 129, 250-261.

Abstract
We compared estimates of actual evapotranspiration (ET) produced with six different vegetation measures derived from the MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and three contrasting estimation approaches using measurements from eddy covariance flux towers at 16 FLUXNET sites located over six different land cover types. The aim was to assess optimal approaches in using optical remote sensing to estimate ET. The first two approaches directly regressed various MODIS vegetation indices (VIs) and products such as leaf area index (LAI) and fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR) with ET and evaporative fraction (EF). In the third approach, the Penman-Monteith (PM) equation was inverted to obtain surface conductance (G(s)), for dry plant canopies. The G(s) values were then regressed against the MODIS data products and used to parameterize the PM equation for retrievals of ET. Jack-Knife cross-validation was used to evaluate the various regression models against observed ET. The PM-G(s) approach provided the lowest root mean square error (RMSE), and highest determination coefficients (R-2) across all sites, with an average RMSE = 38 W m(-2) and R-2=0.72. Direct regressions of observed ET against the VIs resulted in an average RMSE = 60 W m(-2) and R-2=0.22, while the EF regressions an average RMSE = 42 W m(-2) and R-2=0.64. The MODIS LAI and fPAR product produced the poorest estimates of ET (RMSE> 44 W m(-2) and R-2<0.6); while the VIs each performed best for some of the land cover types. The enhanced vegetation index (EVI) produced the best Er estimates for evergreen needleleaf forest (RMSE = 28.4W m(-2), R-2=0.66). The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) best estimated ET in grassland (RMSE = 23.8 W m(-2) and R-2=0.68), cropland (RMSE = 29.2 W m(-2) and R-2=0.86) and woody savannas (RMSE = 25.4 W m(-2) and R-2=0.82), while the VI-based crop coefficient (K-c) yielded the best estimates for evergreen and deciduous broadleaf forests (RMSE = 27 W m(-2) and R-2=0.7 in both cases). Using the ensemble-average of ET as estimated using NDVI, EVI and K-c we computed global grids of dry canopy conductance (G(c)) from which annual statistics were extracted to characterise different functional types. The resulting G(c) values can be used to parameterize land surface models. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

DOI:

ISSN:
0034-4257

FirstGov logo Privacy Policy and Important Notices NASA logo

Curator: Brandon Maccherone
NASA Official: Shannell Frazier

NASA Home Page Goddard Space Flight Center Home Page