Eisfelder, C; Kuenzer, C; Dech, S; Buchroithner, MF (2013). Comparison of Two Remote Sensing Based Models for Regional Net Primary Productivity Estimation-A Case Study in Semi-Arid Central Kazakhstan. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 6(4), 1843-1856.

Abstract
Modelling net primary productivity (NPP) is an important instrument for analysing carbon exchange between atmosphere and vegetation as well as for quantification of carbon sinks and sources. Remote-sensing-based models allow for regional NPP estimation and are potentially transferable to new regions. Comparative model analyses, however, are lacking, especially for semi-arid environments. In this study, two recent remote-sensing-based NPPmodels were applied for the first time to a study region in semi-arid Kazakhstan: RBM, a light-use-efficiency model based on MODIS products, and BETHY/DLR, a soil-vegetation-atmosphere-transfer model. Differences in intermediate products, their influence on calculated NPP, as well as output products are evaluated and discussed. BETHY/DLR calculates higher NPP (mean annual NPP 2010 and 2011: 136.87 g C m(-2) and 106.69 g C m(-2) than RBM (62.14 g C m(-2) and 54.61 g C m(-2)) and shows stronger inter-annual changes. Spatial and seasonal patterns present well phenological differences. Comparison to field data from 2011 showed better results for BETHY/DLR, though both results were highly correlated to the field observations (BETHY/DLR: R-2 = 0.95, RMSE = 8.36 g C m(-2) RBM: R-2 = 0.98, RMSE = 22049 g C m(-2)). The parameterization of the light use efficiency is critical for RBM; also MODIS based 16-day time steps might be too long to capture variable climatic conditions. For BETHY/DLR, the MODIS land cover product applied in this study differentiates insufficient classes within the semi-arid environment; a more detailed land cover map is needed to improve the regional analysis.

DOI:
10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2226707

ISSN: