Skip all navigation and jump to content Jump to site navigation
About MODIS News Data Tools /images2 Science Team Science Team Science Team

   + Home
ABOUT MODIS
MODIS Publications Link
MODIS Presentations Link
MODIS Biographies Link
MODIS Science Team Meetings Link
 

 

 

Bilal, Muhammad; Nichol, Janet E. (2015). Evaluation of MODIS aerosol retrieval algorithms over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region during low to very high pollution events. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 120(15), 7941-7957.

Abstract
This study evaluates the performance of different MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) aerosol algorithms during fine particle pollution events over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region using Aerosol Robotic Network aerosol optical depth (AOD). These algorithms include the Deep Blue (DB) Collection 5.1 (C5) and Collection 6 (C6) algorithms at 10km resolution, the Dark Target (DT) C5 and C6 algorithms at 10km, the DT C6 algorithm at 3km, and the Simplified Aerosol Retrieval Algorithm (SARA) at 500m, 3km, and 10km resolutions. The DB C6 retrievals have 34-39% less uncertainties, 2-3 times smaller root-mean-square error (RMSE), and 3-4 times smaller mean absolute error (MAE) than DB C5 retrievals. The DT C6 has 4-8% lower bias, 4-12% less overestimation, and smaller RMSE and MAE errors than DT C5. Due to underestimation of surface reflectance and the use of inappropriate aerosol schemes, 87-89% of the collocations of the DT C6 at 3km fall above the expected error (EE), with overestimation of 64-79% which is 15-27% higher than that for the DT C6 at 10km. The results suggest that the DT C6 at 3km resolution is less reliable than that at 10km. The SARA AOD has small RMSE and MAE errors with 90-96% of the collocations falling within the EE. Overall, the SARA showed 15-16% less uncertainty than the DB C6 (10km), 69-72% less than the DT C6 (10km), and 79-83% less than the DT C6 (3km) retrievals.

DOI:
10.1002/2015JD023082

ISSN:
2169-897X

NASA Home Page Goddard Space Flight Center Home Page