Publications

Ling, YX; Teng, SW; Liu, C; Dash, J; Morris, H; Pastor-Guzman, J (2022). Assessing the Accuracy of Forest Phenological Extraction from Sentinel-1 C-Band Backscatter Measurements in Deciduous and Coniferous Forests. REMOTE SENSING, 14(3), 674.

Abstract
Satellite remote sensing is an important method for forest phenological studies at continental or global scales. Sentinel-1 (S1), a polar orbit satellite with a spatial resolution of 10 m, provides an opportunity to observe high-resolution forest phenology. The sensitivities of S1 C-band backscatter measurements to vegetation phenology, such as crops, meadows, and mixed forests, have been discussed, whereas their performance for different forest types has not yet been quantitatively assessed. It is necessary to evaluate accuracy before adapting S1 datasets in forest phenological studies. This study discusses the seasonal variations in S1 backscatter measurements and assesses the accuracy of S1-based forest phenological metrics in two types of typical forests: deciduous and coniferous. S1 C-band SAR dual-polarization backscatter measurements for the period 2017-2019 were used to extract forest phenology metrics using the Fourier transform (FT) and double logistic (DL) functions. Phenological metrics from the ground-based PhenoCam dataset were used for evaluation. The S1 backscatter VV-VH signal peaks for deciduous and coniferous forests occur in the winter and summer, respectively. The S1 backscatter could reasonably characterize the start of season (SOS) of deciduous forests, with R-2 values up to 0.8, whereas the R-2 values for coniferous forest SOS were less than 0.30. Moreover, the retrieved end of season (EOS) was less accurate than the SOS. The differences in accuracy of S1 backscatter phenological metrics between deciduous and coniferous forests can be explained by the differences in seasonal changes in their corresponding canopy structures. To conclude, S1 C-band backscatter has a reasonable performance when monitoring the SOS of deciduous broadleaf forests (R-2 = 0.8) and relatively poor performance when extracting EOS of deciduous broadleaf forests (R-2 = 0.25) or phenology of evergreen needleleaf forests (R-2 = 0.2).

DOI:
10.3390/rs14030674

ISSN:
2072-4292