Publications

Ma, J; Zhou, J; Liu, SM; Gottsche, FM; Zhang, XD; Wang, SF; Li, MS (2021). Continuous evaluation of the spatial representativeness of land surface temperature validation sites. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 265, 112669.

Abstract
A reliable accuracy is essential for the application of land surface temperature (LST) products. Current satellite retrieved LSTs are mainly validated over a few homogeneous sites. However, most of the existing ground sites are located in inhomogeneous areas: thus, their spatial representativeness on satellite pixel scales is unknown. In this situation, how to evaluate the spatial representativeness of these inhomogeneous sites, quantify the influence introduced by the spatial representativeness and describe the variation of the site's spatial representativeness are critical questions for satellite LST validation. In an attempt to answer those questions, a so-called temporal variation method (TVM) is proposed for evaluating a ground site's spatial representativeness. The method defines a spatial representativeness indicator (SRI), which is the LST difference between a ground radiometer's field-ofview (FOV) and a satellite pixel, and describes a site's spatial representativeness. Based on the temporal variation of LST, the SRI time series consists of three temporal components: increment ATC, increment DTCF-P, and increment USC, which describe the annual, diurnal, and instantaneous variations of SRI, respectively. Associated with the Landsat TM/ETM+ data and weather parameters, the method is implemented and tested at 16 Chinese ground sites for the validation of MODIS and AATSR LST products. Results show that the temporally continuous SRI (SRITPR) shows high correlations with the original SRI (SRIORI). The variation of SRITPR is mainly determined by changes in surface coverage (i.e. NDVI difference on the two scales) and affected by weather conditions (e.g. near-surface air temperature, accumulative downward solar radiation, and wind speed). Since the SRI is defined as the LST difference between the two scales, it can be used as a bridge to convert the in-situ LST to pixel scale to address the spatial scale mismatch in LST validation. With this idea, the in-situ LST at daytime was converted to pixel scale associated with the SRITPR, and the corresponding MODIS and AATSR LST were validated at the 16 ground sites. Results for MODIS and AATSR LST show that the effect of spatial representativeness on the validation results over the sites is large, with mean biases between -1.95 K and 5.60 K and standard deviations between 0.07 K and 3.72 K. Since the TVM method does not rely on a specific satellite or land surface product, it is readily applied to other LST products (e.g. Sentinel-3 SLSTR LST, NOAA VIIRS LST) and surface parameters (e.g. surface longwave radiation).

DOI:
10.1016/j.rse.2021.112669

ISSN:
0034-4257