Publications

Zhang, Y; Xiao, XM; Jin, C; Dong, JW; Zhou, S; Wagle, P; Joiner, J; Guanter, L; Zhang, YG; Zhang, GL; Qin, YW; Wang, J; Moore, B (2016). Consistency between sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and gross primary production of vegetation in North America. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 183, 154-169.

Abstract
Accurate estimation of the gross primary production (GPP) of terrestrial ecosystems is vital fora better understanding of the spatial-temporal patterns of the global carbon cycle. In this study, we estimate GPP in North America (NA) using the satellite-based Vegetation Photosynthesis Model (VPM), MODIS images at 8-day temporal and 500 m spatial resolutions, and NCEP-NARR (National Center for Environmental Prediction-North America Regional Reanalysis) climate data. The simulated GPP (GPP(VPM)) agrees well with the flux tower derived GPP (GPP(EC)) at 39 AmeriFlux sites (155 site-years). The GPP(VPM) in 2010 is spatially aggregated to 0.5 by 0.5 grid cells and then compared with sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) data from Global Ozone Monitoring Instrument 2 (GOME-2), which is directly related to vegetation photosynthesis. Spatial distribution and seasonal dynamics of GPP(VPM) and GOME-2 SIF show good consistency. At the biome scale, GPP(VPM) and SIF shows strong linear relationships (R-2 > 0.95) and small variations in regression slopes (4.60-5.55 g C m(-2) day(-1)/mW m(-2) nm(-1) sr(-1)). The total annual GPP(VPM) in NA in 2010 is approximately 13.53 Pg C year(-1), which accounts for similar to 11.0% of the global terrestrial GPP and is within the range of annual GPP estimates from six other process-based and data-driven models (11.35-22.23 Pg C year(-1)) Among the seven models, some models did not capture the spatial pattern of GOME-2 SIF data at annual scale, especially in Midwest cropland region. The results from this study demonstrate the reliable performance of VPM at the continental scale, and the potential of SIF data being used as a benchmark to compare with GPP models. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

DOI:
10.1016/j.rse.2016.05.015

ISSN:
0034-4257